Monday, November 9, 2009

Indoctrination in the U.S.A.?


From grade school and up, we have been programmed to believe that our government system is ideal; flawless; we are the true free nation. Our books, contrary to that of other countries, are not indoctrinated, are not written falsely, and contribute to a national sense of democratization. On the whole, we do not question this system, but if we did, would we find that the system is a fallacy? Rather, the question should be, would we know if it was at all?
Here in the United States of America, we do not learn about Mathew, Peter, John, and Paul in public school education. We are not taught the proper prayer to Allah or of the sacred scrolls from the Torah. In Egypt, however, it’s very natural for students to be taught straight from the Koran. In fact, examining the curriculum from that of a sixth grade level, we can find that an emphasis is placed on the work ethic of the individual, clearly outlined from sections of the Qur’an (1). With 90% of Egypt being Islamic, versus the United States, (whose religion varies greatly on ethnicity, location, and environment), it’s easy to see why the Egyptian school system would implement Islam in their core curriculum. If the United States decided to teach Islam as a core class, on the other hand, the people would rally and fight whatever clause instated it. With this being said, it would be nearly impossible to indoctrinate all of our textbooks here in the United States. People would notice what was being taught, and at some point or another, they would speak out against it, as not everyone in this country has the same core belief.
In the United States, we seemingly have rights that many other countries do not, including the freedom of speech, press, the right to peaceably assemble, the right to bear arms, and the right to freedom of religion. We have countless different sources of information, from radio to television to the daily newspaper. There is no opposition towards obtaining information from word-of-mouth. There is not one government official who maintains control over all of these sources; therefore, if the United States were to transmit a set opinion to the whole country, it would be nearly impossible.
Sure, many news-broadcasting channels have political preferences, but those are subject to change after time. Most channels are opposing rivals of one another, and compete for viewers by presenting information that likely adheres to one side of the view or another (for example CNN and FOX). This is not the way that all countries operate their media. In Egypt, there are fewer news stations, and although the country’s economy is free-market based, the few news stations do not present various different viewpoints. Most of Egypt’s media is government controlled through the State Information Service, and the three largest news-broadcasting stations, Al-Ahram, Al-Akhbar, and Al-Gumhuriya, are government owned and operated. Nearly all magazines and newspapers are by printed by one of seven government-owned printing houses (3). What makes Egypt’s control over foreign politics even stricter is the control over these three laws: The Press Law, the Publications Law, and the Penal Code. These three laws allow the Egyptian government to issue and stipulate fines or imprisonment for criticizing the president, members of the government, or any members of state.
When it comes to the bottom line, the United States of America and the Republic of Egypt are two very different countries. The United States houses countless ethnicities and religions, whereas Egypt is primarily dominated by Egyptians and people of the Islamic religion. American media is operated through the free-enterprise system, while Egyptian media is government owned and maintained. So, on the whole, indoctrination in the United States is practically infeasible.


References
1. Guindy, Adel. Islamizing Egyptian Education. Middle East Quarterly. 2009: 76-79
2. Sherbiny, Naiem. America: A View From Egypt. Social Research Online. 2005. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2267/is_4_72/ai_n16129794/?tag=content;col1
3. Gross, M. Pamela. Egypt. Press Reference. http://www.pressreference.com/Co-Fa/Egypt.

4 comments:

  1. Qur'an or Koran? I think you need to Pick one.
    Food for thought: In grade school 1970s, we were taught, Indians were bad, needed to be conqured, Columbus discovered America. Period. Our education was not clouded by the facts. I agree, the author of our textbooks presents history as he/she sees it or would like us to see. The school district sanctions the book (but do they read it or work on reccommendation?). And since we were not there, we rely on historical Facts presented from the viewpoint of the Author. I am not so sure that this is an choreographed effort on the behalf of our government as much as I think a collective belief (or desire to believe) by its Citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is very interesting. Are you saying that we are indoctrinated with democracy and that's good or bad? Also, I think there is a way to tell the media is free. See what happens when they report a story that has a negative impact on teh government. Or see if that is reported at all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The people of the United States have detected an attempt to obtain underlying government control over media sources and the're "mad as hell and not going to take it anymore". The nation's premier "all news network" is slowly returning to it's attempt to be free of bias in reporting. This is because the public has spoken.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A bit confusing and a bit off track. In your opening statement you ask the question "On the whole, we do not question this system, but if we did, would we find that the system is a fallacy? Rather, the question should be, would we know if it was at all?", but then simply state it could not be an indoctrinated system because of the freemarket system ect...
    I think you could support that statement a bit better. Also, is the Egyptian goverment actually dictating what is reported in the news or is the news reported through the vision of a group of people that have a common window to view the world through? (their religious views and historical backgrounds. What stops that from happening in this country?
    Is it possible to have a truly "Free" press system that is unclouded by bias?

    ReplyDelete